<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Guide To Link Building</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/web-design-articles/a-guide-to-link-building.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/web-design-articles/a-guide-to-link-building.html</link>
	<description>Web Design Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 03:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaitlyn@web designer</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/web-design-articles/a-guide-to-link-building.html/comment-page-1/#comment-19697</link>
		<dc:creator>kaitlyn@web designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=3774#comment-19697</guid>
		<description>Domain trust and authority is the biggest indicator of SEO success (have about 24% weightage in Ranking factors) which is given by the quality incoming links. Links flow towards your website have been considered as indication of people&#039;s trust on website. Therefore, Google trusts that site too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domain trust and authority is the biggest indicator of SEO success (have about 24% weightage in Ranking factors) which is given by the quality incoming links. Links flow towards your website have been considered as indication of people&#8217;s trust on website. Therefore, Google trusts that site too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clipping path</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/web-design-articles/a-guide-to-link-building.html/comment-page-1/#comment-17541</link>
		<dc:creator>clipping path</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 03:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=3774#comment-17541</guid>
		<description>The article is pertinent,and link building is a timely issue.But I adhere to every day.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.profimasking.de&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bildbearbeitung&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article is pertinent,and link building is a timely issue.But I adhere to every day.<br />
<a href="http://www.profimasking.de" rel="nofollow">Bildbearbeitung</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krystian</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/web-design-articles/a-guide-to-link-building.html/comment-page-1/#comment-10468</link>
		<dc:creator>Krystian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 07:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=3774#comment-10468</guid>
		<description>@MikeHopley
Have a look into their advanced ranking factors 2009 I think, it&#039;s all out there, but it&#039;s only statistics. They&#039;re talking about domain authority etc, apart from links, but you can&#039;t get authority without links.

Anyway, very short article, it&#039;s good that you mentioned about a varied incoming link text, but you didn&#039;t say why it should be like that.

You also said &quot;when asking for links&quot;, not many webmasters will link to your website if it&#039;s not an authority site or if it doesn&#039;t offer any quality, really interesting content. Most webmasters are used to reciprocal link exchanges and if you don&#039;t reciprocate they&#039;ll get mad, even if you asked for one way link as they&#039;ll feel cheated.

Good point with the variety of link sources, &quot;don&#039;t put all your eggs in one basket&quot;, that&#039;s very true for SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MikeHopley<br />
Have a look into their advanced ranking factors 2009 I think, it&#8217;s all out there, but it&#8217;s only statistics. They&#8217;re talking about domain authority etc, apart from links, but you can&#8217;t get authority without links.</p>
<p>Anyway, very short article, it&#8217;s good that you mentioned about a varied incoming link text, but you didn&#8217;t say why it should be like that.</p>
<p>You also said &#8220;when asking for links&#8221;, not many webmasters will link to your website if it&#8217;s not an authority site or if it doesn&#8217;t offer any quality, really interesting content. Most webmasters are used to reciprocal link exchanges and if you don&#8217;t reciprocate they&#8217;ll get mad, even if you asked for one way link as they&#8217;ll feel cheated.</p>
<p>Good point with the variety of link sources, &#8220;don&#8217;t put all your eggs in one basket&#8221;, that&#8217;s very true for SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeHopley</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/web-design-articles/a-guide-to-link-building.html/comment-page-1/#comment-8333</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeHopley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=3774#comment-8333</guid>
		<description>I made a quick search on SEOmoz, but I didn&#039;t find it.

If you have a particular survey in mind, then why don&#039;t you provide the link? It&#039;s not that hard to list your sources.

The internet makes lazy writers of us all; but I expect better from an article on TWS. I suppose I should remember that the purpose of most articles is to justify the back-link, and nothing more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a quick search on SEOmoz, but I didn&#8217;t find it.</p>
<p>If you have a particular survey in mind, then why don&#8217;t you provide the link? It&#8217;s not that hard to list your sources.</p>
<p>The internet makes lazy writers of us all; but I expect better from an article on TWS. I suppose I should remember that the purpose of most articles is to justify the back-link, and nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/web-design-articles/a-guide-to-link-building.html/comment-page-1/#comment-8293</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=3774#comment-8293</guid>
		<description>The stats were taken from SEOmoz, when they surveyed over 70 SEOs (The figures are also backed up from other sources).

Rough Stats:

24% domain authoirty and trust
43% Link building
16% on site optimisation
17% Other data (such as traffic and CTR, hosting and more)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stats were taken from SEOmoz, when they surveyed over 70 SEOs (The figures are also backed up from other sources).</p>
<p>Rough Stats:</p>
<p>24% domain authoirty and trust<br />
43% Link building<br />
16% on site optimisation<br />
17% Other data (such as traffic and CTR, hosting and more)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeHopley</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/web-design-articles/a-guide-to-link-building.html/comment-page-1/#comment-8279</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeHopley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=3774#comment-8279</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It is thought that link building constitutes around 43% off the overall ranking factors&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Where exactly does this figure come from? By whom is it thought? SEMs? Google employees? Monkeys?

I can&#039;t even tell what the figure means. Is it saying that inbound links (i.e. page rank) constitute 43% of ranking factors (with 57%, presumably, being on-site factors)? Or is it saying that a good link-building campaign can be expected to account for 43% of your final page rank (with the other 57% being &quot;organic&quot; links that you didn&#039;t &quot;build&quot; yourself)?

Sorry to whinge, but I hate bad statistics. If you&#039;re going to quote statistics, then back them up with a source, and make it clear what they actually mean. Don&#039;t just use them for impressive hand-waving.

Otherwise not a bad article, if rather thin.


&lt;i&gt;74% of readers agreed with this comment.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It is thought that link building constitutes around 43% off the overall ranking factors</p></blockquote>
<p>Where exactly does this figure come from? By whom is it thought? SEMs? Google employees? Monkeys?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t even tell what the figure means. Is it saying that inbound links (i.e. page rank) constitute 43% of ranking factors (with 57%, presumably, being on-site factors)? Or is it saying that a good link-building campaign can be expected to account for 43% of your final page rank (with the other 57% being &#8220;organic&#8221; links that you didn&#8217;t &#8220;build&#8221; yourself)?</p>
<p>Sorry to whinge, but I hate bad statistics. If you&#8217;re going to quote statistics, then back them up with a source, and make it clear what they actually mean. Don&#8217;t just use them for impressive hand-waving.</p>
<p>Otherwise not a bad article, if rather thin.</p>
<p><i>74% of readers agreed with this comment.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canvas Photos</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/web-design-articles/a-guide-to-link-building.html/comment-page-1/#comment-8259</link>
		<dc:creator>Canvas Photos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=3774#comment-8259</guid>
		<description>I try to link build everyday for about an hour or two. It&#039;s timely, but I think it really works. Thanks for the article man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try to link build everyday for about an hour or two. It&#8217;s timely, but I think it really works. Thanks for the article man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

