<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: ActiveCollab Client Review</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/product-and-software-reviews/activecollab-client-review.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/product-and-software-reviews/activecollab-client-review.html</link> <description>Squeezing all the info out of Web Design and Development</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:16:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Harshil Karia</title><link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/product-and-software-reviews/activecollab-client-review.html/comment-page-1/#comment-1762</link> <dc:creator>Harshil Karia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:29:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=648#comment-1762</guid> <description>Interesting. Even we&#039;ve started using web based collaboration for client logins but we currently use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deskaway.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Deskaway &lt;/a&gt; - again i would rate it highly. The email integration and live docs makes it much better in my opinion. The core i think is that clients are happy and for something like $250 a year you are effectively managing your projects well, getting an online repository and also giving your clients the feel of finish and physical evidence in an online service which i think is great.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Even we&#8217;ve started using web based collaboration for client logins but we currently use <a
href="http://www.deskaway.com/" rel="nofollow"> Deskaway </a> &#8211; again i would rate it highly. The email integration and live docs makes it much better in my opinion. The core i think is that clients are happy and for something like $250 a year you are effectively managing your projects well, getting an online repository and also giving your clients the feel of finish and physical evidence in an online service which i think is great.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ActiveCollab Review by The Web Squeeze - The Web Squeeze</title><link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/product-and-software-reviews/activecollab-client-review.html/comment-page-1/#comment-1718</link> <dc:creator>ActiveCollab Review by The Web Squeeze - The Web Squeeze</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:46:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=648#comment-1718</guid> <description>[...] Luke Dingle looked at ActiveCollab and had this to say: [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Luke Dingle looked at ActiveCollab and had this to say: [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ActiveCollab Designer Review - The Web Squeeze</title><link>http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/product-and-software-reviews/activecollab-client-review.html/comment-page-1/#comment-1715</link> <dc:creator>ActiveCollab Designer Review - The Web Squeeze</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:23:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsqueeze.com/?p=648#comment-1715</guid> <description>[...] Luke Dingle (Client Prospective)     Category: ReviewsTags: Reviews [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Luke Dingle (Client Prospective)     Category: ReviewsTags: Reviews [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>