Welcome Guest!
Please login
If you do not have an account yet on The Web Squeeze forums, please Register! It’s FREE and there are many benefits:
- Receive Fast Advice
- Learn Programming Languages
- Get Professional Website Reviews
- Quick Troubleshooting Assistance
|
|
Join Optimization
This is a discussion on Join Optimization, within the MySQL section. This forum and the thread "Join Optimization" are both part of the Programming Your Website category.
![]() ![]() |
Apr 15 2008, 12:45 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Squeezing ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 76 Joined: 14-February 08 From: Las Vegas, NV |
This may be a stupid question, so please don't haze me too much for it, but I was just curious if using the join statement is more/less or the same level of effeciency as constructing the same statement with a where clause?
Example: CODE SELECT DISTINCT b.brand_id, c.id FROM ORGANIZATION o INNER JOIN CATEGORIES c ON (o.category = c.id) INNER JOIN INVENTORY i ON (i.SKU = o.sku) INNER JOIN brand b ON (i.brand = b.name) ORDER BY b.brand_id ASC LIMIT 700; VS CODE SELECT DISTINCT b.brand_id, c.id FROM brand b, CATEGORIES c, INVENTORY i, CATEGORIES c WHERE (o.category = c.id) AND (i.SKU = o.sku) AND (i.brand = b.name) ORDER BY b.brand_id ASC LIMIT 700; I'm currently using the first one as I've always done, but this would be one of those queries that would take about 3 hours to run, so I'm wondering if it would have any effect on the speed if I were to use the second method? -------------------- http://www.infoonmike.com
"Always program as if the person who will be maintaining your program is a violent psychopath that knows where you live." Martin Golding |
|
|
Apr 15 2008, 03:19 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Squeeze Machine ![]() Posts: 760 Joined: 13-February 08 From: Catching the squeezed drips downunder. |
Hi mate,
You are actually using JOINS in the second query anyway CODE FROM brand b, CATEGORIES c, INVENTORY i etc... Is actually a "cross join" where every row is returned with every other row from the other tables. The first query will return a much smaller result set and of course this will be faster. -------------------- |
|
|
If you found The Web Squeeze to be helpful, please donate so we can keep this site FREE, FRESH, and fortified with Web Design & Development info!
![]() ![]() |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
24 | Squeeze Bot | 1,091 | 25th November 2008 - 09:31 AM Last post by: EggManJohn |
|||
![]() |
7 | karinne | 368 | 10th May 2008 - 01:40 AM Last post by: Antti |
|||
![]() |
9 | unitedcraig | 329 | 11th June 2008 - 02:18 AM Last post by: unitedcraig |
|||






Apr 15 2008, 12:45 PM









